Voter Registration Training

August 3rd, 2008 | by Michael Steltzer

Hi dear friends of Barack Obama!

The Obama Tsunami has hit us.  The 24th of July 2008 will not be forgotten so soon. The wave has moved us forward and the energy has moved the world.

So what can we do?

One project is to register Americans in Berlin to vote.  If you would like to learn how to do that, then you come to a voter registration training session on the 5th of August at 6:00 PM in Max und Moritz Restaurant (www.maxundmoritzberlin.de ).  There you can learn all that is necessary to register Americans living abroad, so that they can vote for Barack Obama.

The training session will take you trough all the necessary steps.  You will also receive voter registration material, so that you can deal with it yourself and with your friends.

We are also in the process of pushing for the international voter registration day on August 9th, where we want to find and register large numbers of Americans in our city.

We will have voter registration points at Winterfeldmarkt, Käthe Kollwitz Platz, Hackester Markt, Babylon Theater and some other places.

Do not hesitate to contact Courtnie  courtnie.shupe@googlemail.com in order to sign up for the 9th of August.

Greetings!

Michael Steltzer
Berlin Chapter Chair
Democrats Abroad Berlin

May 28th, 2008 | by Eva Adams

Hi All!

The Puerto Rico primary will be held on June 1st followed by the Montana and South Dakota primaries on June 3rd.  Just as important, if not more so, is that the Democratic Rules Committee will meet on Saturday, May 31st to try and finally clear up the Florida and Michigan mess.  Their solution is likely to be a compromise that Clinton won’t like because they will take all arguments into account which will allow Obama delegates and grant her less than totally breaking the original rules.  I have no idea if their decision will effect the number of delegates needed to be 2025 or not. 

If not, then Barack is only FORTY-SIX delegates away from the number he needs to clinch the nomination.  Superdelegates have been breaking for him at a rate of 3-4 a day, though that pace is slowing down.  They are likely to come in a great number after the June 3rd primaries so June 4th may be the latest that we learn of who will be the nominee.  However, even if Puerto Rico goes to Clinton and he picks up only 20-25 delegates there, as long as superdelegates keep declaring this week he’d only need 25-30 to put him over.  That is within the realm of possibility to happen even before the June 3rd primaries, depending on the rules committee. 

Meanwhile there’s a report out that Obama is “banking” up to 3 dozen delegates.  In other words, superdelegates have declared their support to the Obama campaign but they won’t release their names until after the June 3rd primaries are over.  Could it mean that night?

So it’s almost over, one way or another.  I can’t wait.  These last weeks of the campaign have been especially frustrating even as I know he’s basically already one.  You can keep your own daily watch on the superdelegates declarations here:

http://www.dailykos.com/

or here:

http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/03/ultimate-delegate-summary.html

Yes We Can Indeed!

Eva

Obama coming to Berlin!?

May 28th, 2008 | by Michael Steltzer

Hi all!

Check the link for a great story on the possibility of Obama coming to Berlin this summer.

http://www.sueddeutsche.de/ausland/artikel/339/176804/

We should prepare a warm welcome for him!

The above is based on an interview with Carsten Voigt, who is responsible for North American policy within the German Foreign Office.  The interview was done by a member of the Tagesspiegel.

There is also an interview with the German minister for foreign affairs Steinmeier in Der Spiegel about a telephone convesation he had with Obama a few days ago.  The article has a good title “Crazy about Barack - Obamamania in Germany”

http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,555437,00.html

He also mentions Obama coming to Berlin.

We should get our show together!

Greetings!

Michael

Obama Banners and Buttons for Berlin

May 28th, 2008 | by Michael Steltzer

Hi all!

I just received 10 Obama Banners (2 meters by 0,5 meters). They are tough, with grommets and good looking. I paid 15€ each. Come and get them.

Obama Banner

I also have full size Obama Buttons. Cost is 1 € each.

Obama Button

You can copy the pics and use them on your websites. For higher resolution go to

http://www.demsinberlin.de/cms/media/img/Obama-Banner.jpg

http://www.demsinberlin.de/cms/media/img/Obama-Button.jpg

You can get them in my store: Flying Colors, Eisenacherstr. 81, 10823 Berlin-Schöneberg or call during business hours: 787 03636

Just ask for me!

Greetings and Go Obama!

Michael Steltzer

Obamania Sweeps France - Le Monde

April 29th, 2008 | by Michael Steltzer

Le Monde, France

April 26, 2008

‘Obamania Sweeps France’

“My French students are fascinated by the phenomenon. They keep saying: ‘How great to have politicians of such quality!,’ they’re jealous.”

– Jeannette Demeestere, Professor of Political Science

“Frankly, it is not the kind of information to publicize; since having the backing of French opinion is more of a handicap than an asset for an American candidate!”

– Anna Marie Mattson, Democrats Abroad

“This election concerns the entire planet … it’s important to us … we are attentive to the emergence of this candidate bearing hope and who is open to the world.”

– Samuel Solvit, President of the French Committee to Support Barack Obama

By Annick Cojean

Translated By Sandrine Ageorges

April 26, 2008

France - Le Monde - Original Article (France)

American Democrats living in France prefer Barack Obama to Hillary Clinton. But the French aren’t far behind. The French Committee to Support Obama has some very distinguished recruits.

In a posh building on the Boulevard St. Germain, about 40 Parisian Americans, wine glass in hand, listen attentively to the voice of a male speaker emerging from a speaker phone on a coffee table in the living room.

The voice is from Chicago. To be more precise, it’s the headquarters of Democratic candidate Barack Obama. The voice is of Michael Robertson, Senator Obama’s Legislative Coordinator, who cleverly dissects the results of the April 23 Pennsylvania primary, won just hours earlier by Hillary Clinton. Even if it was predictable, her triumphant speech caused consternation among these Parisian supporters of the Illinois Senator WATCH .

“Do you have any questions?” asks a questioner at the end of Robertson’s presentation. The group opens up. Of course they have questions! It was in the fact the very purpose of this little meeting to support Barack Obama (the are 289 members registered in Paris, against 64 for Hillary Clinton). Constance Borde WATCH , the hostess for the evening, is Vice President of Democrats Abroad , begins, “We all know that Hillary can’t catch up. But I fear her galling attacks will weaken Obama for the struggle he will have to mount against the Republican candidate. Do you think irreparable damage has been done … That voters will turn to McCain?”

All faces turn toward the loudspeaker. That’s the question. And Constance Borde’s frankness seems to have suddenly released an anxiety and even an anger that has permeated their minds.

“It’s terrible!,” says one white-haired woman. “Hillary has carried on a vicious, negative, Republican-style campaign.” A man says: “For eight years, we have had to deal with an American president who’s as dumb as a stone. I’m afraid Hillary will look a lot like him! The country’s in flames she hears nothing, listens to nothing and hangs on beyond all reason!”

Some smile, most shake their heads. “It’s incredible that we’re still talking about her! She has lost!” says one bitter woman. “It’s not only her ambition or her ego that impel her” adds a man next to her, “It’s the large groups and lobbies which control Washington. They think only about their contracts and tremble about seeing a new man.”

She’s betting on the superdelegates,” explains Constance Borde: “It is they she intends to seduce and persuade. She was the Party’s candidate, the one that controlled the machine, and she wants to show them that she’s in the best position to win in the larger states that generally lean Republican.” A voice rises: “But at which price? She’s playing the Bush card and the politics of fear. It’s because of her that we have the shameful racial bias that has been introduced into the country! It makes me crazy!”

In any case, all are delighted that their candidate has resisted the temptation to resort to personal attacks and continues to behave like a gentleman. “Hillary’s making us lose sight of the essential, while Obama embodies our highest ideals” says a professor, “but when are we going to take the issue of McCain seriously? He is a dangerous type, close to certain Washington fascists who are only happy when engaged in war or a conflict. And now he looks like a moderate …”

A young man, born in France but a fresh arrival from Los Angeles, admits to being ignorant of who Democrats abroad are voting for. “Obama!,” Responds the unprompted group. Of the 22,000 American Democrats around the world, 65.6 percent have declared for Obama, against 32.7 for Senator Clinton. Only two countries out of 70 (Israel and the Dominican Republic) have withstood the Obama wave. In France, the number has reached 71.8 percent. “And what about the French?” asks the American. This time the group erupts into laughter. There’s no doubt there: the French vote for Obama.

[Editor’s Note: While the organization Democrats Abroad has 22,000 members in 164 countries, many more Democrats than that actually live overseas. Most estimates are that between one and three million Democrats live overseas, while according to the Washington Post: The [total] number of Americans living overseas is commonly estimated at about 6 million - twice the population of Chicago and greater than that of 33 U.S. states. ].

“Look at my tee-shirt!” Smiles Constance Borde, revealing a chest emblazoned with the likeness of the young senator. “I purchased it on a French pro-Obama Web site.”

Jeannette Demeestere, Professor of Political Science, adds: “My French students are fascinated by the phenomenon. They keep saying: ‘How great to have politicians of such mettle! … they are jealous.”

According to Zachary Miller, who coordinates the French campaign of the biracial candidate, the polls show that the French heart clearly lean toward his “protégé.” Not a week goes by without someone or another asking him to come and speak or inversely, to offer their help. The other day, an American woman wearing a pin with Obama’s picture on it was greeted happily by a Black bus driver who transported her for free. Another was offered fruits for free at a market in Pigalle. “Pleasant!” adds Anna Marie Mattson, also a leader of Democrats Abroad. “But frankly, it’s not the kind of information to publicize; since having the backing of French opinion is more of a handicap than an asset for an American candidate!”

Samuel Solvit, the 22-year-old president of the French Committee to Support Barack Obama, makes every effort to “publicize” the issue. He wants to expand the movement he launched from the outset with the involvement of some famous names: Pierre Bergé, Sonia Rykiel, Bernard-Henri Lévy, Jack Lang, Bertrand Delanoë and … Axel Poniatowski, Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee in the National Assembly.

French heavyweights line up for Obama: From left to right: Industrialist Pierre

Bergé; Fashion designer Sonia Rykiel; Philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy; Socialist

MP Jack Lang; Mayor of Paris Bertrand Delanoë; Chairman of French Assembly’s

Foreign Affairs Committee, Axel Poniatowski.

Posted by WORLDMEETS.US

Posted by WORLDMEETS.US

Encyclopedic about the background, speeches and program of the senator from Illinois, the marketing student dreams of creating a “dynamic” around candidate Obama. First of all he says: “to stimulate a debate about America, globalization, a much-needed renewal of the political class, and in the interest of the young …” And then to announce inside the United States that, “this election concerns the entire planet … that it’s important to us and that we are attentive to the emergence of this candidate bearing hope and who is open to the world.”

Created in late January, his site, www.pour-obama.fr is being constantly improved, and follows the daily news of the American election, along with testimonials and links to numerous Web sites, blogs and support networks (a dozen from Facebook alone, amounting to 2,000 people).

Political scientist Olivier Duhamel, among those that are part of the French Committee, is obviously not one to be “duped” by the influence of such an initiative, but hopes to foster some reflection on the political, economic and institutional backwardness of France in terms of embracing greater diversity. “The simple observation of Obama’s emergence should move minds” he says, “especially at a moment when ideologies have become so blurred and when the hatred of immigrants acts like a demagogic venom.”

And then, the professor adds, “how to eschew the pleasure that one gets when witnessing a turning point in history?”

Axel Poniatowski, for his part, is convinced that Obama will herald a far more multilateral world, promote a rapprochement between France and America, and with more “openness and balance” deal with the issue of the Middle East. “This is a magnificent opportunity” he says. Enthusiastic, but without illusion. In the campaign for the American presidency, the sympathy of the rest of the world counts, unfortunately, for peanuts!

CLICK HERE FOR FRENCH VERSION

Obama Bridge Project - Sat. May 3, 08 - 15:30

April 28th, 2008 | by Michael Steltzer

We, friends of Barack Obama in Berlin, would like to support the “yes we span” Obama Bridge Project on Saturday, the 3rd of May 2008 at the Oberbaumbrücke between Kreuzberg and Friederichshain. We will meet on the Kreuzberg side of the Bridge, take some pictures and than walk over the bridge, take some more pictures and just have a good time connecting. Perhaps we can all go for a drink afterwards ..

So come one, come all and make and bring your Obama Banners and Obama Flags and Obama Buttons and let us show that we want to connect.

“Yes we span” is an initiative of Meredith Wheeler from France, who writes on the http://groups.yahoo.com/group/obamasbridges/

“The Obama Bridge Project is an effort to collect digital photographs of Obama supporters around the world, armed with posters and banners, posing at or on famous or scenic bridges–the bridge being an ideal symbol for the Obama candidacy.

Bridge unite two banks, spans chasms, gaps and troubled water, brings together opposing sides.

We plan to gather these bridge photos and make a montage set to music and post it on YouTube

and with luck get it shown at the Democratic National convention in August.

We have a filmmaker willing to assemble the montage.

Our deadline for photos is mid-May–but any we have in the next two weeks will be shown at

the Democrats Abroad global caucus in Vancouver to promote the project and inspire others to participate.

Down in my part of France, we’ll be doing this at the new bridge in Millau (central France), designed by Norman Foster and currently the biggest bridge in the world. We’re aiming for the weekend of

May 10/11 (the 2nd day is rain cover).

Other bridges/countries participating so far include:

Vienna has already done a series of photos but plans others:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cs___/sets/72157604334308683/

Sawfar Bridge in Beirut (Contact: Eugene Sensig-Dabbous)
London Bridge (TBA which one!) (Contact: Carole Bell)
Burrard Bridge (Vancouver) (Contact: Sean Lauer)
The foot bridge in Gustav Vidgeland Park in Oslo (Contact: Barbara Odegard)
Rainbow Bridge (Niagra Falls) (Contact: Ken Sherman)
Bosphorus Bridge (Istanbul) (Contact: Jonas Celebiler)
Chicago Bridge (TBA which ones) (Contact: Lani McClendon)
The Arnhem “Bridge Too Far” in Holland (Contact: Sandra)
The smallest drawbridge in the world (Bermuda) (Contact: Sassy [Internationals for Obama])

Our wish list includes:

*Skye Bridge in Scotland

*Gods Bridge in Morocco

*Erasmus Bridge in Rotterdam

*Rialto Bridge in Venice

*Ponte Vecchio in Florence

*Charles Bridge in Prague

*Bridge of Sighs in Cambridge

*The Forth Road Bridge in Scotland

*Rakotzkybruecke in Germany

*Conway Castle Bridge in Wales

*Gudapest Chain Bridge in Hungary

*Fehmarnsundbruecke in Germany

*Matituki-Tal in New Zealand

*Ponte San Angelo in Rome

*Luis I bridge in Porto, Portugal

*Iwakuni bridge in Japan

*Lupu Bridge in Shanghai

*Ha’Penny Bridge in Dublin

*Tromostovjo bridge in Slovenia

If you are inspired to take part in this project, please get in touch!

We set up a yahoo listserv to facilitate discussion, brainstorming, problem-solving.

We can also share photos on it. Please click on the link and JOIN.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/obamasbridges/

YES WE SPAN!*

Meredith Wheeler

meredith.wheeler@…

(33) (0)5 63 59 11 32“

A number of activities on the bridges around the world can be seen at:

To see all the photos so far:

http://www.flickr.com/groups/bridgesforobama/pool/show/

To see the sites plotted on a global map:

http://www.flickr.com/groups/bridgesforobama/pool/map?mode=group

(Click on the dots to see the photos.)

To see bridges still to come: http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pvmab7tp2AwW8csp8_uASQA

Greetings!

Michael Steltzer

The Constitution & Peggy Noonan

March 21st, 2008 | by Seth Cochran

I feel like I should somehow fill in the gap since I last posted.  To try and articulate why I think Obama lost Ohio and only half won Texas.  To retell the story my father told me about Republicans in our county overwhelmingly voting for Hillary in the open primary because “she would be easier to beat than Obama.” I could search the Internet for news stories I have read that corroborate this anecdote and make the point that Republicans fear Obama because he makes us talk.  I could do all that - but I won’t.

Instead, I want to talk about the Constitution.  You see,  I just joined a new political discussion group here in Berlin called Café Americain and we are reading the Constitution, line by line, discussing the syntax of the document that defined the founders’ democratic experiment.   One thing that truly jumps of the first page of the Constitution (Article 1. Section2. Paragraph3) is the description of how to count the American population. The Constitution says that Representatives will be apportioned according to their state’s Numbers, which

 ”shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. “

This means that when determining the population that should be represented in Congress, each free (read white) person, man or woman, counts as one; each indentured servant, man or woman, counts as one; each tax paying Indian, man or woman, counts as one; and all other (read slave or Indian who does not pay taxes) counts as three fifths, or 60% of a person.  Thankfully, the injustice at the foundation of our inception has since been amended, but the long struggle to bring equality to the people our founding fathers defined as fractional human beings has indeed been difficult and come at a great cost.   This is the topic that Barack Obama addresses in the most honest discussion of race that I have ever seen anyone initiate, politician or otherwise.     


While I have watched the speech several times and find it brave, insightful and long overdue, I have been extremely curious to hear what the pundits think and how the American people react.  This morning, after a late night setting up our website for Café Americain, the first thing I saw when I woke up was an OpEd piece in the Wall St. Journal from Peggy Noonan.  Now if you are not familiar with Ms. Noonan, let me give you a brief introduction: conservative columnist and former speech writer for Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, and yes, she even campaigned for George W. Bush in 2004.  While I have not and do not always agree with Ms. Noonan, this is a woman who I have admired since childhood as one of our most eloquent patriots.  I have included the entire transcript of Ms. Noonan’s March 21, 2008 opinion column entitled “A Thinking Man’s Speech.”    

I thought Barack Obama’s speech was strong, thoughtful and important. Rather beautifully, it was a speech to think to, not clap to. It was clear that’s what he wanted, and this is rare.

It seemed to me as honest a speech as one in his position could give within the limits imposed by politics. As such it was a contribution. We’ll see if it was a success. The blowhard guild, proud member since 2000, praised it, and, in the biggest compliment, cable news shows came out of the speech not with jokes or jaded insiderism, but with thought. They started talking, pundits left and right, black and white, about what they’d experienced of race in America. It was kind of wonderful. I thought, Go, America, go, go.
You know what Mr. Obama said. The Rev. Jeremiah Wright was wrong. His sermons were “incendiary,” and they “denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation.” Mr. Obama admitted that if all he knew of Mr. Wright were what he saw on the “endless loop . . . of YouTube,” he wouldn’t like him either. But he’s known him 20 years as a man who taught him Christian faith, helped the poor, served as a Marine, and leads a community helping the homeless, needy and sick. “As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me.” He would not renounce their friendship.

Most significantly, Mr. Obama asserted that race in America has become a generational story. The original sin of slavery is a fact, but the progress we have lived through the past 50 years means each generation experiences race differently. Older blacks, like Mr. Wright, remember Jim Crow and were left misshapen by it. Some rose anyway, some did not; of the latter, a “legacy of defeat” went on to misshape another generation. The result: destructive anger that is at times “exploited by politicians” and that can keep African-Americans “from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition.” But “a similar anger exists within segments of the white community.” He speaks of working- and middle-class whites whose “experience is the immigrant experience,” who started with nothing. “As far as they’re concerned, no one handed them anything, they’ve built it from scratch.” “So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town,” when they hear of someone receiving preferences they never received, and “when they’re told their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced,” they feel anger too.

This is all, simply, true. And we are not used to political figures being frank, in this way, in public. For this Mr. Obama deserves deep credit. It is also true the particular whites Obama chose to paint — ethnic, middle class — are precisely the voters he needs to draw in Pennsylvania. It was strategically clever. But as one who witnessed busing in Boston first hand, and whose memories of those days can still bring tears, I was glad for his admission that busing was experienced as an injustice by the white working class. Next step: admitting it was an injustice, period.

* * *

The primary rhetorical virtue of the speech can be found in two words, endemic and Faulkner. Endemic is the kind of word political consultants don’t let politicians use because 72% of Americans don’t understand it. This lowest-common-denominator thinking, based on dizzy polling, has long degraded American discourse. When Obama said Mr. Wright wrongly encouraged “a view that sees white racism as endemic,” everyone understood. Because they’re not, actually, stupid. As for Faulkner — well, this was an American politician quoting William Faulkner: “The past isn’t dead and buried. In fact, it isn’t even past.” This is a thought, an interesting one, which means most current politicians would never share it.

The speech assumed the audience was intelligent. This was a compliment, and I suspect was received as a gift. It also assumed many in the audience were educated. I was grateful for this, as the educated are not much addressed in American politics.

Here I point out an aspect of the speech that may have a beneficial impact on current rhetoric. It is assumed now that a candidate must say a silly, boring line — “And families in Michigan matter!” or “What I stand for is affordable quality health care!” — and the audience will clap. The line and the applause make, together, the eight-second soundbite that will be used tonight on the news, and seen by the people. This has been standard politico-journalistic procedure for 20 years.

Mr. Obama subverted this in his speech. He didn’t have applause lines. He didn’t give you eight seconds of a line followed by clapping. He spoke in full and longish paragraphs that didn’t summon applause. This left TV producers having to use longer-than-usual soundbites in order to capture his meaning. And so the cuts of the speech you heard on the news were more substantial and interesting than usual, which made the coverage of the speech better. People who didn’t hear it but only saw parts on the news got a real sense of what he’d said.

If Hillary or John McCain said something interesting, they’d get more than an eight-second cut too. But it works only if you don’t write an applause-line speech. It works only if you write a thinking speech.

They should try it.

* * *

Here’s what didn’t work. Near the end of the speech, Mr. Obama painted an America that didn’t summon thoughts of Faulkner but of William Blake. The bankruptcies, the dark satanic mills, the job loss and corporate corruptions. There is of course some truth in his portrait, but why do appeals to the Democratic base have to be so unrelievedly, so unrealistically, bleak?

This connected in my mind to the persistent feeling one has — the fear one has, actually — that the Obamas, he and she, may not actually know all that much about America. They are bright, accomplished, decent, they know all about the yuppie experience, the buppie experience, Ivy League ways, networking. But they bring along with all this — perhaps defensively, to keep their ideological views from being refuted by the evidence of their own lives, or so as not to be embarrassed about how nice fame, success, and power are — habitual reversions to how tough it is to be in America, and to be black in America, and how everyone since the Reagan days has been dying of nothing to eat, and of exploding untreated diseases. America is always coming to them on crutches.

But most people didn’t experience the past 25 years that way. Because it wasn’t that way. Do the Obamas know it?

This is a lot of baggage to bring into the Executive Mansion.

Still, it was a good speech, and a serious one. I don’t know if it will help him. We’re in uncharted territory. We’ve never had a major-party presidential front-runner who is black, or rather black and white, who has given such an address. We don’t know if more voters will be alienated by Mr. Wright than will be impressed by the speech about Mr. Wright. We don’t know if voters will welcome a meditation on race. My sense: The speech will be labeled by history as the speech that saved a candidacy or the speech that helped do it in. I hope the former.

This column from Peggy Noonan and even comments from Mike Huckabee prove that there is something happening in America.  Its bigger than the release of White House records or the bitter words of an alienated pastor.  We, the People, have an opportunity before us that begs our full consideration.  No politician in my lifetime has ever spoken so honestly about such a divisive topic and the reaction of our electorate will determine if this type behavior becomes the norm rather than the lifetime exception.  If Barack Obama does not win the next presidency, it will be because we allow ourselves to get mired in irrelevance and distracted from addressing the injuries of our Republic.  In any case, we will elect exactly the government we deserve - let’s just realize that we deserve more this time.

Dialing for Change

February 29th, 2008 | by Seth Cochran

It seems like an eternity since the buzz at Brandenburg gate and Obama’s string of wins has lulled me into a confident belief that he will certainly be the Democratic nominee. As I watch McCain and Obama trade jabs and see President Bush criticize Obama’s foreign policy strategy (a major positive for Obama), I feel even more certain. But reality just set in: THIS RACE IS FAR FROM OVER!

I just read an article that reminded me that victory, especially in my home state of Texas, is far from certain. In fact, Obama’s victory hinges on a major turnout from unpaid volunteers to offset Hillary’s entrenched organization. If that turnout fails to materialize and Clintons win Ohio, we could very quickly fall back into the politics of yesterday. But I am optimistic that the same reasons that brought one million contributors to the Obama campaign will help us prevail in Texas.

However, optimism alone will not win Texas. For this reason, I am committing to call 100 Texas voters before next Tuesday and tell them why this Texan loves Obama. That’s right, I will pick up my phone in Berlin, Germany, and dial 100 Texans during the next 5 days. Why don’t you join me?

Let’s give America back to the people. Make a call.

Why a young german likes Obama

February 20th, 2008 | by Patrik Bey

Well, why should a young german actually be interessted in american domestic policy? Okay,  U.S. domestic policy will have a big influence on our economy and a few other things. But I am a student and I have a good job, so why care about american elections?

Actually it is really easy: I am not excited about american domestic policy! BUT: I am interessted in the biggest chance for the young generation to bring out change in the most powerfull country on earth. It would be a lie to say I am not even more excited about Obama because he´s american, but I am especially interessted in the person.

To be honost, two years ago I would had call you crazy if you would have tell me how excited I will become about this election!

But for me Obama just spoke out of my soul, he said what had been my hope for america all the time since america took the wrong direction in 2002!

So please america don´t throw away that unique chance of unity and change!

You rock, Barack!

This is a must see!

February 17th, 2008 | by Stephen Bwete

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky_mjTDj9UU